Text 1: Architect Dr. Susan Kim designs for longevity. "Buildings should last centuries," Kim argues. "Durable materials and timeless aesthetics reduce waste and honor craft traditions. Disposable architecture degrades our built environment."
Text 2: Urban theorist Dr. James Lu values adaptability. "Cities evolve constantly," Lu observes. "Architecture locked in permanent forms cannot respond to changing needs. Flexibility and repurposability matter more than permanence in dynamic urban contexts."
Based on the texts, Kim and Lu would most likely disagree about which of the following?
Whether buildings require any design consideration
Whether architectural permanence or adaptability should be prioritized
Whether cities contain buildings at all
Whether architects have professional expertise
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Kim prioritizes longevity and permanence ("last centuries"). Lu prioritizes adaptability and flexibility ("respond to changing needs"). Different temporal orientations.
- Evidence: Kim: durable, timeless; Lu: flexible, repurposable.
- Reasoning: Both value good design but define it differently temporally.
- Conclusion: Permanence vs. adaptability is their core disagreement.
Choice A is incorrect because both believe in careful design. Choice C is incorrect because both discuss urban buildings. Choice D is incorrect because professional expertise isn't debated.