Text 1: Philosopher Dr. Elena Ross argues for mandatory voting. "When voting is optional, participation skews wealthy and educated," Ross writes. "Compulsory voting ensures all voices contribute to democracy."
Text 2: Political scientist Dr. Michael Brown opposes mandates. "Forced voting violates individual freedom," Brown contends. "Many non-voters make deliberate choices. The right to vote includes the right not to vote."
Based on the texts, Ross and Brown fundamentally disagree about which principle?
Whether elections should exist at all
Whether collective representation or individual liberty should take priority
Whether wealthy citizens should be allowed to vote
Whether democracy has any value as a system
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Ross prioritizes collective representation ("all voices"). Brown prioritizes individual liberty ("right not to vote"). Their conflict is about which principle matters more.
- Evidence: Ross values universal participation; Brown values choice.
- Reasoning: Mandatory vs. voluntary reflects representation vs. freedom.
- Conclusion: They prioritize different democratic values.
Choice A is incorrect because both support elections. Choice C is incorrect because neither addresses wealth-based voting rights. Choice D is incorrect because both value democracy.