Text 1: Architect Dr. Lisa Yamamoto advocates for green buildings. "Sustainable design reduces energy consumption and lowers operating costs," Yamamoto writes. "Every new building should meet stringent environmental standards."
Text 2: Construction analyst Michael Burns notes practical constraints. "While green building benefits are real, upfront costs remain 10-20% higher," Burns explains. "For budget-limited projects, these premiums can be prohibitive."
What concern does Burns raise that Yamamoto's argument does not address?
Whether green buildings actually reduce energy consumption
Whether initial cost barriers limit adoption despite long-term savings
Whether architects have sufficient training in sustainable design
Whether occupant health benefits can be measured
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Yamamoto emphasizes long-term payoff but doesn't address Burns's point: upfront costs are prohibitive for some projects.
- Evidence: Burns: "budget-limited projects" find premiums "prohibitive."
- Reasoning: Long-term ROI doesn't help those who can't afford initial investment.
- Conclusion: Yamamoto overlooks upfront cost barriers.
Choice A is incorrect because Burns doesn't dispute energy reduction. Choice C is incorrect because training isn't mentioned. Choice D is incorrect because health claims aren't questioned.