Text 1: Philosopher Dr. Rebecca Moore argues for ethical consumption. "Consumers have moral obligations to consider how their purchases affect workers, animals, and the environment," Moore writes. "Choosing fair trade, cruelty-free, and sustainable products is one way individuals can combat systemic injustice."
Text 2: Political theorist Dr. Samuel Wright critiques individual consumer ethics. "Placing responsibility on consumers diverts attention from corporate and governmental accountability," Wright argues. "Most people lack the time, money, and information for ethical consumption. Systemic problems require systemic solutions, not individual guilt."
How does Wright's argument in Text 2 challenge Moore's position in Text 1?
By denying that environmental and labor problems exist
By questioning whether individual choices can address systemic issues
By arguing that corporations have no ethical obligations
By claiming that consumers prefer cheap products regardless of ethics
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Wright doesn't deny the problems Moore identifies but questions whether individual consumer choices can solve them. He argues "systemic problems require systemic solutions."
- Evidence: Wright claims individual consumption "diverts attention" from larger solutions.
- Reasoning: His critique targets the mechanism (individual action), not the goal (addressing injustice).
- Conclusion: Wright questions individual effectiveness against systemic issues.
Choice A is incorrect because Wright acknowledges systemic problems. Choice C is incorrect because Wright emphasizes corporate accountability. Choice D is incorrect because Wright focuses on barriers, not preferences.