Text 1: Pediatrician Dr. Laura Kim recommends limiting children's screen time. "Excessive screen use correlates with attention problems, sleep disruption, and reduced physical activity," Kim states. "The American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines exist for good reason. Parents should enforce strict time limits."
Text 2: Child psychologist Dr. Robert Hayes argues for a nuanced approach. "Content matters more than time," Hayes explains. "An hour of educational programming differs vastly from an hour of passive video consumption. Rather than rigid limits, parents should focus on what children watch and ensure screens don't replace essential activities like play and family interaction."
Based on the texts, what is a key difference between Kim's and Hayes's approaches to children's screen use?
Kim focuses on quantity while Hayes emphasizes quality and context
Kim supports technology while Hayes opposes it entirely
Kim relies on research while Hayes relies on personal opinion
Kim addresses teenagers while Hayes addresses younger children
Correct Answer: A
Choice A is the correct answer. Kim emphasizes "strict time limits" (quantity), while Hayes argues "content matters more than time" and considers context (what children watch, what activities screens replace).
- Evidence: Kim: "strict time limits"; Hayes: "content matters more than time."
- Reasoning: Their recommendations differ in focus—hours vs. quality.
- Conclusion: Quantity vs. quality/context is the key distinction.
Choice B is incorrect because Hayes doesn't oppose technology entirely. Choice C is incorrect because both reference professional frameworks. Choice D is incorrect because neither specifies age groups.