Text 1: Nutritionist Dr. Sarah Miller advocates for plant-based diets. "Research consistently shows that vegetarian and vegan diets reduce the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and certain cancers," Miller states. "The environmental benefits—reduced greenhouse emissions and land use—make plant-based eating the ethical choice."
Text 2: Dietitian James Park emphasizes dietary flexibility. "While plant-based diets have benefits, they're not suitable for everyone," Park notes. "Some individuals require nutrients most easily obtained from animal sources. Additionally, cultural food traditions carry significant psychological and social value that shouldn't be dismissed."
Which choice best describes the relationship between the two texts?
Text 2 provides scientific evidence that contradicts Text 1's health claims
Text 2 introduces considerations that complicate Text 1's recommendation
Text 2 extends Text 1's argument to include environmental factors
Text 2 agrees with Text 1 but suggests a different implementation timeline
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Text 2 doesn't reject plant-based diets but adds nuance: individual nutritional needs and cultural significance are factors Text 1 overlooks.
- Evidence: Park acknowledges benefits while raising "not suitable for everyone" and cultural considerations.
- Reasoning: These additions complicate rather than refute Miller's straightforward recommendation.
- Conclusion: Text 2 introduces complexity without dismissing Text 1 entirely.
Choice A is incorrect because Park doesn't contradict the health claims directly. Choice C is incorrect because Text 1 already mentions environmental factors. Choice D is incorrect because there's no discussion of implementation timelines.