Text 1: Historian Dr. Sarah Kim argues that the Industrial Revolution's positive impacts are often overlooked. "While working conditions were initially harsh, industrialization ultimately raised living standards, increased literacy, and created the middle class. These long-term benefits transformed society."
Text 2: Social historian James Wright emphasizes the human cost of industrialization. "Factory workers, including children, endured 16-hour days in dangerous conditions. The wealth generated went primarily to factory owners while laborers lived in poverty. Progress came at an unconscionable price."
Which choice best describes the relationship between the two texts?
Text 2 provides specific evidence supporting Text 1's general claim
Text 2 offers an alternative perspective that challenges Text 1's emphasis
Text 2 extends Text 1's argument to a different time period
Text 2 questions the historical accuracy of Text 1's claims
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Text 1 emphasizes long-term benefits of industrialization, while Text 2 highlights the immediate human suffering, offering a contrasting perspective.
- Evidence: Text 1 focuses on "positive impacts" and "long-term benefits."
- Reasoning: Text 2 counters with "human cost" and "unconscionable price."
- Conclusion: The texts present competing emphases rather than contradicting facts.
Choice A is incorrect because Text 2 challenges rather than supports Text 1. Choice C is incorrect because both texts discuss the same historical period. Choice D is incorrect because Text 2 doesn't dispute the facts but emphasizes different aspects.