Text 1: Climate scientist Dr. Elena Vasquez argues that while renewable energy adoption is crucial, the transition must be gradual. "Abruptly abandoning fossil fuels would devastate economies dependent on traditional energy sectors," she writes. "A 30-year transition plan allows for workforce retraining and infrastructure development."
Text 2: Environmental activist Marcus Chen contends that gradual climate action is insufficient. "We don't have 30 years," Chen argues. "The latest data shows we must achieve net-zero emissions within 15 years to avoid catastrophic tipping points. Economic concerns cannot outweigh planetary survival."
Based on the texts, how would Chen (Text 2) most likely respond to Vasquez's argument in Text 1?
By agreeing that workforce retraining is essential for the transition
By arguing that the timeline Vasquez proposes is dangerously inadequate
By suggesting that renewable energy technology is not yet viable
By acknowledging that economic stability should be the primary concern
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Chen explicitly states "We don't have 30 years" and emphasizes that action must occur "within 15 years," directly contradicting Vasquez's 30-year timeline.
- Evidence: Chen argues the timeline is too slow given "catastrophic tipping points."
- Reasoning: His concern for "planetary survival" suggests economic concerns are secondary.
- Conclusion: Chen would criticize the extended timeline as inadequate.
Choice A is incorrect because Chen doesn't focus on workforce concerns. Choice C is incorrect because Chen supports rapid renewable adoption, not doubting its viability. Choice D is incorrect because Chen explicitly states economic concerns "cannot outweigh planetary survival."