Philosopher Dr. Amy Park argues that the simulation hypothesis—that we live in a computer simulation—cannot be dismissed as philosophical speculation because it makes testable predictions.
Which scientific analysis would best support Park's testability claim?
Computers can simulate
If we're simulated, computational constraints should produce observable artifacts: quantization of space-time, processing-load effects on physics, information-theoretic limits—physicists have proposed experiments testing these predictions, making the hypothesis empirically meaningful
Philosophy asks questions
Reality is complex
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the best answer. Specific predictions + proposed tests + observable consequences proves empirical content.
💡 Strategy: Claims about testability need specific predictions and means of testing.