Philosopher Dr. Rachel Park argues that effective altruism—maximizing good per dollar—provides better ethical guidance than traditional charitable giving.
7
readingWhich impact comparison would best support Park's effectiveness argument?
A
Charity is important
B
Giving rates vary
C
The most effective global health interventions save 100x more lives per dollar than typical charitable choices; yet most giving follows emotional appeal rather than impact data—systematic effectiveness analysis could multiply charitable impact exponentially
D
Ethics has many approaches
Correct Answer: C
Choice C is the best answer. 100x difference + typical misallocation + multiplication potential proves approach value.
💡 Strategy: Comparative methodology claims need magnitude of improvement data.