Cognitive scientist Dr. Rachel Kim argues that human decision-making is fundamentally irrational, driven by cognitive biases rather than logical analysis.
1
readingWhich experimental finding would best support Kim's irrationality claim?
A
People make mistakes
B
When identical problems were framed as gains vs losses, people made opposite choices 75% of the time, even when outcomes were mathematically equivalent—demonstrating systematic bias
C
Decisions require information
D
Some choices are complex
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the best answer. Opposite responses to equivalent problems proves systematic irrationality.
💡 Strategy: Irrationality claims need demonstrations of systematic (not random) deviation from logic.