Psychologist Dr. David Park argues that eyewitness confidence is a poor predictor of accuracy, despite juries treating confident witnesses as more reliable.

7
reading

Which research finding would best support Park's accuracy-confidence dissociation claim?

A

DNA evidence has exonerated innocent people

B

Eye movements during identification showed equally confident witnesses were correct only 60% of the time, with high-confidence identifications no more accurate than low-confidence ones

C

Witnesses sometimes change testimony

D

Memory is reconstructive

Correct Answer: B

Choice B is the best answer. Objective accuracy data showing no confidence-accuracy correlation proves the dissociation.

💡 Strategy: Claims about correlations (or lack thereof) need statistical relationship data.