Psychologist Dr. David Park argues that eyewitness confidence is a poor predictor of accuracy, despite juries treating confident witnesses as more reliable.
Which research finding would best support Park's accuracy-confidence dissociation claim?
DNA evidence has exonerated innocent people
Eye movements during identification showed equally confident witnesses were correct only 60% of the time, with high-confidence identifications no more accurate than low-confidence ones
Witnesses sometimes change testimony
Memory is reconstructive
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the best answer. Objective accuracy data showing no confidence-accuracy correlation proves the dissociation.
💡 Strategy: Claims about correlations (or lack thereof) need statistical relationship data.