Climate scientist Dr. Amy Lee argues that reforestation is more cost-effective than carbon capture technology for removing CO2.

10
reading

Which comparison would best support Lee's cost-effectiveness claim?

A

Trees absorb carbon dioxide

B

Carbon capture technology exists

C

Reforestation removes CO2 at 5−50pertonwhilemechanicalcarboncapturecosts5-50 per ton while mechanical carbon capture costs 250-600 per ton, with reforestation providing additional benefits like biodiversity

D

Many countries plant trees

Correct Answer: C

Choice C is the best answer. Direct cost comparison (5−50vs5-50 vs 250-600) proves reforestation advantage.

💡 Strategy: Cost-effectiveness claims need dollar-per-unit comparisons.

Back to Set
Set 10: Command of Evidence 10