Economist Dr. James Patel argues that minimum wage increases do not necessarily lead to job losses. He suggests that employers often absorb higher labor costs through reduced turnover, increased productivity, and modest price increases rather than layoffs.
Which data would most effectively support Patel's argument?
Low-wage workers strongly support minimum wage increases in surveys
Companies paying above minimum wage have higher stock prices
Economists disagree about minimum wage effects
After a 15% minimum wage increase, employment in affected industries remained stable while prices rose only 2%
Correct Answer: D
Choice D is the best answer. This shows Patel's predicted outcome: stable employment + modest price increase.
- Context clues: Patel claims no job losses, with costs absorbed through prices.
- Evidence evaluation: Stable employment proves no layoffs; 2% price rise shows absorption.
- Verify: Real-world data matches the theoretical prediction exactly.
💡 Strategy: Look for evidence that confirms multiple parts of a complex claim.
Choice A is incorrect because worker opinions don't prove economic outcomes. Choice B is incorrect because stock prices don't address minimum wage effects. Choice C is incorrect because disagreement among economists doesn't support any view.