The following text discusses cognitive psychology.
Cognitive dissonance describes the mental discomfort that arises when beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors conflict. Festinger's classic study found that participants paid only 20. The 20 could attribute lying to external reward, experiencing less dissonance. This finding has implications for persuasion: sometimes insufficient incentives produce greater attitude change than larger rewards because they force internal justification.
Why did participants paid 20?
$1 was an enormous sum of money that motivated attitude change
Insufficient external justification required internal attitude change to resolve dissonance
The $20 group experienced more dissonance
Neither group experienced any dissonance
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. With "20 "could attribute lying to external reward."
- Evidence: $1 insufficient external reason; attitude change resolved dissonance.
- Reasoning: Lacking external justification required internal justification.
- Conclusion: Insufficient external reward forced internal attitude adjustment.
Choice A is incorrect because1 group experienced more dissonance. Choice D is incorrect because dissonance was clearly present.