The following text discusses media studies.

The concept of "agenda-setting" describes how media influence not what people think but what they think about. By covering certain issues extensively while ignoring others, media shape public perception of what matters. During election campaigns, issues receiving heavy coverage become voters' priorities—not because voters are told what to believe but because coverage signals importance. Digital media has complicated this theory: with more sources and user curation, who sets the agenda becomes contested. Yet studies show social media may concentrate attention even more intensely on fewer trending topics.

7
reading

How might social media affect agenda-setting according to the text?

A

It eliminates agenda-setting entirely

B

It may intensify concentration on fewer trending topics

C

It only covers issues traditional media ignore

D

It prevents any issues from receiving attention

Correct Answer: B

Choice B is the correct answer. The text notes that despite more sources, "studies show social media may concentrate attention even more intensely on fewer trending topics."

  1. Evidence: More intense concentration on fewer trending topics.
  2. Reasoning: More sources didn't disperse attention as expected.
  3. Conclusion: Social media may intensify rather than diffuse agenda concentration.

Choice A is incorrect because social media affects but doesn't eliminate agenda-setting. Choice C is incorrect because no such claim is made. Choice D is incorrect because trending topics receive intense attention.