The following text is about architecture.
Brutalist architecture, characterized by massive concrete structures with bold geometric forms, emerged in the mid-20th century. Originally named after the French "béton brut" (raw concrete), the style emphasized honesty in materials and function over ornament. Many brutalist buildings have faced demolition as tastes changed. However, a preservation movement has grown, with advocates arguing that these buildings represent important cultural heritage and that their striking visual presence deserves reconsideration rather than destruction.
What is the current debate about brutalist architecture?
Whether concrete is a suitable building material
Whether these buildings should be preserved or demolished
Who invented the brutalist style
Whether all new buildings should be brutalist
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. The text describes "demolition" threats versus a "preservation movement" arguing for "reconsideration rather than destruction."
- Evidence: Demolition threatens many; preservationists advocate reconsideration.
- Reasoning: The core tension is about keeping or removing these buildings.
- Conclusion: Preservation vs. demolition is the central debate.
Choice A is incorrect because material suitability isn't the current question. Choice C is incorrect because origination isn't debated in the text. Choice D is incorrect because new construction isn't discussed.