The following text is from an article about urban development.
Jane Jacobs revolutionized urban planning in the 1960s by arguing against the dominant approach of her era. While planners favored large-scale projects that demolished "disorganized" neighborhoods, Jacobs demonstrated that these supposed slums actually contained vibrant communities and complex economic ecosystems. She advocated for preserving neighborhood character, mixed-use zoning, and pedestrian-friendly streets. Though initially dismissed by professionals, her ideas now form the foundation of many contemporary urban planning principles.
How did Jane Jacobs's views differ from prevailing urban planning ideas?
She supported larger demolition projects than other planners
She valued existing neighborhood communities that others dismissed as disorganized
She believed cars should be prioritized over pedestrians
She focused on suburban development rather than cities
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. The text contrasts planners who saw "disorganized" neighborhoods with Jacobs who saw "vibrant communities and complex economic ecosystems."
- Evidence: Others saw slums; Jacobs saw value.
- Reasoning: Different perceptions of existing neighborhoods.
- Conclusion: Jacobs valued what others dismissed.
Choice A is incorrect because she opposed demolition. Choice C is incorrect because she advocated pedestrian-friendly streets. Choice D is incorrect because her focus was on city neighborhoods.